O’Dwyer loses case against developers

By Nathan Morley Published on January 21, 2011

HOMEBUYER Conor O’Dwyer was left devastated yesterday after losing his private criminal prosecution against a land developer in a case which could have far-reaching implications for the property sector in Cyprus.

The long awaited verdict has cleared Paralimni based Karayannas Developers of any wrongdoing – whilst delivering a bitter blow for O’Dwyer after years of legal wrangling over a disputed villa in Frenaros.

Despite the state refusing to press charges citing lack of evidence, O’Dwyer pushed on with the action after a court found there was a prima facie case.

O’Dwyer, 40, tried to establish criminal activity claiming his contract was cancelled by Karayannas – pointing to the fact that the disputed four-bedroom villa was already rubber stamped in his name at the Land Registry.

To make matters worse, O’Dwyer alleged that the villa was later resold without his knowledge, resulting in him not only losing the property but also £100,000 of installments he had paid to the developer.

“My worst fears have come true,” O’Dwyer told the Cyprus Mail after the court hearing yesterday, “What this means is that a developer can keep your money and never deliver your house, then if they want they can re-sell it. Our contract is in the Land Registry and someone else is in our house, it’s that simple.”

In a surprise move, the judge presiding over the Famagusta district court in Larnaca also ordered that O’Dwyer foot all the legal bills, which he estimates could amount to tens of thousands of pounds.

O’Dwyer initiated the legal action two years ago citing section 303A of the penal code – the action made the case significant, as 303A has never been used in such a prosecution.

Article 303A states that: “Any person who, with intent to defraud, deals in immovable property belonging to another is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for seven years.”

Lawyer Yiannos Georgiaides, acting for O’Dwyer, confirmed to the Cyprus Mail that an appeal against the ruling will be launched, whilst also insisting that there had been a clear error of law.

Georgiaides pointed to existing Supreme Court legislation which he said states that as soon as a contract is filed by a buyer with the Land Registry, the buyer is the legal owner of the property.

“We will appeal against the decision of the judge in this private prosecution because we believe it is against existing Cyprus law and could give the wrong messages to investors from abroad that in Cyprus their rights are not protected by buying property even if they file the contract of sale with the land registry.”

Georgiaides added that investors must be assured that the law in Cyprus is safeguarding their rights.

“The judgments of the Supreme Court are binding on the lower courts since in Cyprus we follow the English common law system,” he said.

Supporters of O’Dwyer maintain that the case has national significance and could have severe adverse effects on the property market.

However the lawyer for Karayannas Developers, Efthimios Flourentzou told the Cyprus Mail that he was delighted with the outcome and the key points of the case had been laid bare during the hearing.

“I was convinced about the outcome, substantial elements of the charges brought simply could not be proved – justice is done,” he told the Cyprus Mail.

Karayannas Developers have continually denied any wrongdoing and accused O’Dwyer of attempting to extort a more expensive house from them – a charge that O’Dwyer flatly denies.

The ongoing saga has taken a series of twists and turns over the past five years, including O’Dwyer staging demonstrations outside the Cyprus High Commission in London, sleeping outside the Presidential Palace in Nicosia and publishing his entire story online and on the video site You Tube.

Last year the developer, his son and an associate were all convicted of actual bodily harm against O’Dwyer and given suspended sentences after they rammed his rental car at a busy junction near the disputed house, then subjected him to a savage beating.

In a separate twist, the state filed charges against O’Dwyer last year – following a complaint from the developer over a personal website he created documenting the entire house purchasing saga.

O’Dwyer is a self employed importer of giftware and his wife Michaela is a management accountant. Their intention when purchasing the property was to live in Cyprus and start a new business.

The case has been closely followed by expatriate communities on the island, where as many as 30,000 Britons are now thought to own property.
Copyright © Cyprus Mail

Conor O’Dwyer’s lawyer speaks out

Conor O’Dwyer’s lawyer was interviewed on Cyprus radio channel CyBC 2 by Rosie Charalambous about the criminal case against property developer Karayiannas and Michelle McDonald, the woman now living in Conor’s home.

EARLIER this evening Conor O’Dwyer’s lawyer, Yiannos Georgiades, spoke with Rosie Charalambous on the CyBC Radio 2 programme ‘Round and About’ about the criminal case against property developer Karayiannas and the woman now living in Conor’s home, Michelle McDonald.

Here are Mr Georgiades opening remarks and background to the case:

“First of all I would like to clarify that it was a private prosecution, it was a criminal case. It wasn’t the Civil Case that is still pending through which Conor is pursuing his rights and is asking for remedies. This is just a private prosecution under Section 303A of the Penal Code.

And according to this section of the Penal Code the developer or anybody really, cannot sell or rent or in any other way give possession of a house to a third person which he knows belongs to another person.

So in this case Conor bought this house and he was according to the Supreme Court Judgement in Cyprus he was the owner, the beneficial owner, from the moment he filed the contract of sale with the Land Registry.

That was done in 2006. In 2006 Conor bought his house with his wife and they filed their contract with the Land Registry. They paid CYP66,000 and later on because of disputes he had with the developer, the developer decided unilaterally to terminate this contract and sell it to another person although he knew that it belongs to Conor and although he knew that he should go to court – the civil court – in order to decide whether he could lawfully terminate this contract and sell it to another person.

Well, the thing is that the second buyer – it seems like she knew about Conor’s purchase of this house and still she carried on buying the house and that is why in this criminal prosecution we filed the case also against the second buyer. Because according to the law, section 303A, anybody who is entering into transactions of selling or renting or getting a house belonging to another is liable for criminal offence.”

Click here to listen to the 16 minute interview between Rosie Charalambous and lawyer Yiannos Georgiades.

By: Nigel Howarth Published: Friday 21st January 2011
To see comments from British expats read this article in the Cyprus Property News
Copyright © Cyprus Property News

British home buyer loses case in court ruling

A judge has ruled that British home buyer Conor O’Dwyer’s private criminal prosecution against Karayiannas and Michelle McDonald has not been proven and has ordered Mr O’Dwyer to pay their costs.

CONOR O’Dwyer has failed in his attempt to get justice through the Cyprus judicial system following a court ruling earlier today in his private criminal case against property developer Christoforos Karayiannas & Son Ltd and Michelle McDonald, the person now living in his home.

In 2008 the Attorney General wrote a three-line letter to O’Dwyer telling him that his developers had not committed any crime by effectively re-selling a house legally registered in his name. However, when O’Dwyer brought a private criminal prosecution against the accused, the judge agreed that Karayiannas and McDonald had a case to answer.

The judge accepted evidence from an official from the Department of Lands and Surveys who confirmed that O’Dwyer’s contract had been duly signed and lodged with the Land Registry for ‘Specific Performance’.

The court heard evidence that O’Dwyer made the stage payments as required by his contract until Karayiannas refused to accept a payment. It also heard how O’Dwyer made numerous attempts contact the Karayiannas to discover what was happening and how all of these were ignored.

The judge also accepted that the developer had resold the property to someone else without seeking Mr O’Dwyer’s consent to cancel the contract or applying for a court order to withdraw the contract from the Land Registry.

But despite the evidence submitted the judge did not consider it sufficient to prove that a fraud had been committed ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ and ordered Mr. O’Dwyer to pay the defendants’ costs.

According to the Island’s ‘Specific Performance Law’, the deposit of a contact of sale at a Land Registry prevents a property from being sold for a second time. It can only be withdrawn from the Land Registry with the agreement of the vendor and the purchaser – or by a court order.

Mr O’Dwyer’s lawyer, Yiannos G. Georgiades, said that: “We will appeal the decision; we believe it goes against the laws of Cyprus. The decision could give the wrong messages to overseas investors that their rights are not protected when they buy property in Cyprus even if they have filed their contracts with the Land Registry.”

“Investors must be assured that the laws of Cyprus safeguard their rights if they file the contract with the Land Registry and that the developer cannot resell their property without their consent.”

Referring to case law Andricos Nicou and others v George Georgiou 1 CLR(1999) p 940, Mr Georgiades added “The judgements of the Supreme Court are binding on the lower courts since in Cyprus we follow the English common law system.”

By: Nigel Howarth
Published: Thursday 20th January 2011
Too see comments from British expats read this article in the Cyprus Property News
Copyright © Cyprus Property News

ITV documents O’Dwyer case

An ITV crew was in Cyprus this week to record a segment for prime-time television show ‘Homes From Hell’ which investigates claims of “foreign retreats which started off as dreams and turned into nightmares”.

Conor O'Dwyer protesting outside the Presidential Palace in Nicosia with ITV crew
Conor O’Dwyer protesting outside the Presidential Palace in Nicosia with ITV crew

BRITISH national Conor O’Dwyer worked with the TV crew for two full days on Sunday and Monday as it documented the lengthy legal battle he has been involved in with a Paralimni-based developer since 2005.

“The programme mainly focused on the fact that the contract to my property is currently in the Land Registry, my money is in the developer’s bank, while someone else is living in my house,” said O’Dwyer.

His legal battle began five years ago after he signed a property deal with Karayiannas property developer in Frenaros for the cost of £163,000.

O’Dwyer claims that after he purchased the house it was then resold without his knowledge by the developers.

Additionally, he says that soon after he purchased the house, the developers went back on their promise that an empty lot to the side of his property would not be built on. The developer, however, argued in court that this was never stated in the contract and they had already committed to building another property.

ITV also recorded O’Dwyer staging a one- man camping protest outside the Presidential Palace, which began on Monday and is set to and today, intended to highlight a criminal case being brought against him by the state for publishing his story online.

O’Dwyer is set to appear before a Paralimni court as a defendant on November 23 accused of publishing slanderous video footage of his developers on his website.

“The reason for this demonstration is to highlight what some Cypriot local developers are doing to foreign investors and how the state is letting them get away with it,” said O’Dwyer.

Additionally, Attorney General Petros Clerides has filed an appeal against a court decision regarding the assault of O’Dwyer by his developers.

Paralimni court recently sentenced 55-year old Christoforos Karayiannas and his son Marios, 35, to a 10-month suspended jail term for assaulting O’Dwyer in 2008.

A third man was also found guilty of assault and was ordered to pay a €3,000 fine.

The court found the men guilty of causing actual bodily harm (ABH) but Clerides has appealed for a more serious sentence of grievous bodily harm (GBH), which carries a maximum of seven years.

During the trial, the court heard how the three men rammed into O’Dwyer’s car in Frenaros village and then beat him, resulting in him being hospitalised for a week.

By: Paul Malaos Published: Friday 12th November 2010
Copyright © Cyprus Weekly

To see comments from British expats read this article in the Cyprus Property News

Shots fired at British TV crew

Reports of shots being fired at a British TV crew in Cyprus, who have been on the Island investigating and filming a number of property scams, have appeared in the Greek language media.

ACCORDING to reports in a number of Greek language newspapers, shots were apparently fired in the direction of a British TV crew filming in Cyprus for the upcoming ITV series ‘Homes from Hell’.

The incident occurred last Sunday when the crew travelled to Frenaros to film the property at the centre of the Conor O’Dwyer case. While filming at the rear of the house they heard gunfire and the sound of shotgun pellets landing in their vicinity.

At the front of the house the film crew were confronted by a number of men. They were told that they were on private property and were ordered to stop filming.

The TV crew reported the incident to the Famagusta Divisional Police Headquarters. But apparently the Police declined to visit the scene saying that the shots probably came from hunters in an area near the property where hunting is allowed.

We shall bring you more news on this story as it unfolds. The TV crew are flying back to the UK this evening and we hope to speak with them early next week.

By: Nigel Howarth Published: Thursday 11th November 2010
To see comments from British expats read this article in the Cyprus Property News
Copyright © Cyprus Property News

The court of world opinion has already decided

Now that the judgement on the Conor O’Dwyer assault case has been handed down, many people around the world will be drawing their own conclusions about the quality and integrity of the Cyprus justice system.

The Sunday Mail editorial opinion on the ramifications was spot-on. In many respects, the judgement, light sentences and judge’s comments seeking to blame the victim for being beaten up have become somewhat irrelevant in the wider scheme of things.

For, the Court of World Opinion had already delivered its own judgement and was already administering its own collective punishment. The particular defendant company will be lucky to survive, given the extent of the global media antipathy towards the defendants.

Whatever the public position of the Cyprus establishment in apparently supporting errant developers in general in their appalling and often fraudulent treatment of buyers, they are now definitely feeling the pain of the consequences. The entire property industry and the economy as a whole will continue to be punished by the on-going failure to correct the title deeds-cum-fraud scandal. The latest Conor O’Dwyer judgement will simply ensure that foreign buyers do not return for some years, even if the government took drastic corrective action today.

All trust and confidence has gone. The boycott by foreign buyers may even be permanent.

Dr Alan Waring, Larnaca
November 11th 2010

Our view: Are we about to see justice for all?

THE CRASH of the stock market, in which thousands lost their life savings or ended up with huge debts that they are still paying off today, ensured that very few people would ever again view the Cyprus Stock Exchange as a trustworthy institution. The CSE authorities may have introduced tighter controls and tougher regulations after the fiasco but, 10 years on, investing in the shares of companies listed on the exchange is still considered risky activity by the majority of people.

Once the damage is done, it is very difficult to change people’s perceptions, more so when the authorities fail to take punitive action against the culprits, professionals who knowingly misled investors with cooked accounts and unrealistic forecasts. The overriding impression created was that the law offered no effective protection to investors from dishonest businessmen looking to make a fast buck at the expense of gullible people.

This same mistake has now been made in the property market, which also went through a ‘bubble phase’, attracting all sorts of cowboys, posing as developers, who saw an opportunity to make a quick profit. Most of the buyers were foreigners and therefore easy prey as they were not aware of the Cyprus laws and were not guaranteed reliable legal advice.

The results are well-known and far from flattering for Cyprus. One couple recently lost their flat, some buyers were sold properties that had already been sold, others ended up in flats without electricity and there are close to 10,000 foreigner property-owners without title deeds, praying that the developer would not go bankrupt and the bank takes over their property. There has been one positive case in which owners sued a lawyer who had misled them and were paid damages in the region of €100,000.

This mess has received extensive media coverage abroad, particularly in Britain from which most buyers of holiday homes came. British MEPs have raised the issue of title deeds at the European Parliament, thus making the problem known across Europe. It was the worst possible publicity the struggling holiday home market could have received as it amplified the effects of the recession and jeopardised the future of many developers.

Given that government proposals on the title deeds issue, which also affects some 90,000 Cypriots, will solve none of the old problems, there was only one way for Cyprus to re-build its tarnished image – taking a tough line in cases of developers deceiving buyers that were brought before justice. It was critically important to show that the law offered protection to foreigners who had been deceived by locals; the case of the lawyer who had to pay damages to his clients was a step in the right direction.

But in the last week this good work has been undone by the case of Connor O’Dwyer who had been assaulted by three men (a developer he was in dispute with, the developer’s son and an associate) and was hospitalised for a week. His three attackers were found guilty of causing actual bodily harm by the court but the judge did not give a custodial sentence. Father and son were given a 10-month suspended prison sentence while the third man was fined €3,000. The developer had also crashed his car into O’Dwyer’s but for that misdemeanour the court gave him two penalty points, instead of three that would have caused him to lose his licence.

The court’s leniency towards O’Dwyer’s attackers was quite astonishing and will not boost the confidence of foreigners in our justice system. It is more likely to encourage the view, rightly or wrongly, that the courts are not very tough on crimes by Cypriots against foreigners. To add insult to injury, O’Dwyer now faces criminal charges for posting offensive and harassing messages “without reasonable cause”, for publishing personal data and for threatening violence.

The Attorney-general may have been obliged to charge O’Dwyer after the police received a complaint, but it seems bizarre that the state would prosecute for alleged offences committed six years ago. On Friday it was reported that the Attorney-general would lodge an appeal against the court’s decision and lenient sentence in the O’Dwyer case. One prosecutor told the Cyprus Mail: The Attorney-general’s position is that nothing changes because he is British or any other nationality. Justice is for all.”

The authorities may have finally realised the damage being done to Cyprus’ image by our system’s failure to protect property buyers, but unfortunately, this seems like a case of too little too late.

November 7, 2010

State to appeal O’Dwyer decision and sentence

THE Attorney-general will appeal a court decision and the sentence handed down in the assault of a British national by a developer following a dispute over a property.

On Wednesday, a Paralimni court sentenced property developers, Christoforos Karayiannas, 55 and his son Marios, 35, to a 10-month jail term that was however suspended for two years for assaulting Conor O’Dwyer in 2008.

A third man involved in the incident, 31-year-old Charalambos Ttigis was fined €3,000.

The court found the trio guilty last month of assaulting O’Dwyer and causing actual bodily harm (ABH) – and not the more serious grievous bodily harm (GBH) count, the state had charged them with.

State prosecutor Thanasis Papanicolaou told the Cyprus Mail yesterday that the state will appeal. “I have been authorised by the Attorney-general to file an appeal for both the decision and the sentence,” Papanicolaou said. He added that this would be done in the next few days.

Papanicolaou stressed, that the fact that the plaintiff was British did not make any difference to the state.

“Every person has rights in the Republic of Cyprus, whether they are Cypriots, foreigners, EU nationals or third country nationals,” he said. “The Attorney- general’s position is that nothing changes because he is British or any other nationality. Justice is for all.”

The GBH charge carries a maximum of seven years in jail while ABH goes up to three years.

In her decision on October 27, Judge Evi Antoniou said O’Dwyer – when he testified during the trial – was “excessive in most points.”

“He was stressed, lost his temper, and through his testimony it became evident that the only thing he wanted was the punishment of the defendants,” the judge said. “This led him to numerous contradictions in his testimony.”

During sentencing, the judge said she accepted the position that Christoforos and Marios Karayiannas had been repeatedly provoked by the plaintiff. “Recording most of the conversations the plaintiff had with defendant One without him knowing … publishing the conversations on the Internet, the claims of the plaintiff that defendants One and Two are liars and they mislead people, and publishing these claims as well as harassing” the defendants’ clients “cannot be ignored,” the judge said.

“The plaintiff’s behaviour cannot be isolated from the way things went. He activated four spy cameras; one being a micro- camera hidden well in his jacket to peacefully measure, according to his claim, the pavement of the house he bought and to take pictures,” the judge said.

That provocation was taken into consideration when deciding whether to suspend the sentence, the judge said. It is believed that this particular point will be disputed by the prosecution in the appeal.

The legal precedent cited by the judge stated that provocation can be a mitigating factor in passing sentence but nowhere did it explicitly say that it can be used to suspend a sentence.

By: George Psyllides Published: Friday 5th November 2010

To see comments from British expats read this article in the Cyprus Property News

Developers escape jail sentence in assault case

THE property developers convicted last week of assaulting a British expat escaped jail yesterday after the presiding judge handed down a 10 month suspended prison sentence for two of them and issued the third a €3,000 fine.

Christoforos Karayiannas, 55, and his son Marios Karayiannas, 35, received the jail sentences suspended for two years while their associate Charalambous Ttigis, 31, who allegedly pinned down Conor O’Dwyer during the assault in 2007, received a €3,000 fine.

They were found guilty of actual bodily harm (ABH) against O’Dwyer, who said yesterday “I am absolutely shocked and disgusted. This trial was 100 per cent worse than the assault. It seems that in two years of hearings the judge has lost sight of who the victim was.”

O’Dwyer’s lawyer in two other cases that he has against the Karayiannas’, Yiannos Georgiades, also expressed his surprise at yesterday’s decision. He told the Cyprus Mail “I’m quite shocked. In other cases… where three men have assaulted one vulnerable man… the assaulter has ended up in prison.”

He also questioned the judge’s decision to reduce the conviction from grievous bodily harm (GBH) to ABH, and from a custodial to a suspended sentence.

The sentences follow an equally lenient sentence handed down to Christoforos Karayiannas for crashing into O’Dwyer’s car during the incident in 2007. He received a mere two penalty points on his driving licence. Had he been given three he would have lost his licence.

During the trial, the court heard how the men rammed O’Dwyer’s rental car at a busy junction in the eastern village of Frenaros, he was then subjected to a savage beating, including having his head stamped on – the attack left him in hospital for a week.

The controversy between the two parties began five years ago when O’Dwyer claimed he purchased a house in Frenaros that was then resold without his knowledge by the developers.

An emotional O’Dwyer said he was in a state of shock at hearing the result, having spent years protesting and campaigning to have his case heard. “So far all I have gained is two points on (Karayiannas’) licence and a suspended sentence”.

The civil case against the Karayiannas’, which will examine a dispute over the termination of the contract between the O’Dwyer and the developers, is due to begin on Friday.

A second private criminal prosecution case is already underway, for the alleged double sale of O’Dwyer’s house. At the same time, Georgiades said, the Attorney General is also bringing a case against O’Dwyer for the content of his website.

By: Patrick Dewhurst
Published: November 4th, 2010
Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2008

O'Dwyer assault sentencing delayed

THE SENTENCING of three men in the Conor O’Dwyer assault case has been adjourned until Wednesday morning.

The case involves a developer from Paralimni, his son and an associate who were all convicted last week of the actual bodily harm of O’Dwyer in a dispute over property in the tiny eastern village of Frenaros.

Sentencing and mitigation had been due to be given yesterday morning at Larnaca District Court.

Having already spent five days in custody, developer Christoforos Karayiannas 55, his son Marios Karayiannas, 35, and Charalambous Ttigis, 31, were returned to police cells.

During the trial, the court heard how the men rammed O’Dwyer’s rental car at a busy junction in the eastern village of Frenaros, he was then subjected to a savage beating, including having his head stamped on – the attack left him in hospital for a week.

Meanwhile, the state has filed charges against O’Dwyer – following a complaint from the developer — over a website he created, http://www.lyingbuilder.com documenting the dispute with Karayiannas and his treatment.

According to the indictment, O’Dwyer faces seven charges – two for posting offensive messages “without reasonable cause”, two for posting harassing messages “without reasonable cause”, two for publishing personal data and one for “threatening violence”.

The latter, according to the details of the charge, refers to a threat the defendant allegedly made, to post recordings of his conversations with Marios Karayiannas on his website unless he “carried out an act, which he had no legal obligation to undertake”.

The indictment further adds that O’Dwyer’s goal was to insult the reputation of Marios Karayiannas and his company.

The alleged offences took place between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008.

Though not too serious, some of the charges do carry custodial sentences.

The state’s decision to prosecute O’Dwyer on these grounds has raised questions, especially after the attorney-general back in May decided not to prosecute anyone over death threats against a journalist posted on the Christofias-watch blog.

The timing of the state’s case has also raised eyebrows as it comes some four years after the alleged offences took place and during a private prosecution case O’Dwyer has initiated against the developer.

In fact, O’Dwyer, says he was served with the papers on the day he was due to testify in his private prosecution case.

The private prosecution case concerns the alleged unlawful sale of O’Dwyer’s house to a third party.

O’Dwyer filed a private prosecution case under Article 303 (A) of the penal code, after the state said it would not press charges against the developer citing lack of evidence.

However, the court has found there is a prima facie case. Closing arguments for that case are scheduled for November 26.

Three days earlier, O’Dwyer will have to appear before court to answer to the charges regarding his website.

It is understood that his defence will file a motion for the case to be thrown out because of the time that has lapsed and that it was frivolous, vexatious and an effort to intimidate O’Dwyer for pursuing his rights.

Nov 02, 2010